Talk:747
From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference
[edit] VfD - Moved 23 Jul 2006
[edit] 747
An article for the Boeing 747 was started here, but I moved it to the proper location. I would normally say it is worth leaving the re-direct, but I am not sure in this case. Most articles that are just numbers are years, for example 2367. Do we want to have one that isn't, and is instead a redirect to another article? --OuroborosCobra talk 16:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - if you're going to move and then put the redirect up for deletion, at least move the links pointing to said redirect. :) I've done that now. -- Sulfur 16:38, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Whoops, didn't think any had been created. --OuroborosCobra talk 17:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and return the article to 747 using Boeing 747 as a redirect as previously. A disambiguation notice (such as on 47) it should be sufficient to get visitors to early history if they're looking for that year, not that anything significant in the Star Trek universe happened in that year. Additionally, the plane was never referred to as a "Boeing 747" in dialogue, just as a "747." While it's relatively certain this refers to the B747, we shouldn't make that assumption. -- SmokeDetector47( TALK ) 05:16, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, return, year-note. Agree w/SmokeDetector. - AJ Halliwell 04:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Decision: Keep and move. - AJ Halliwell 10:23, 23 July 2006 (UTC)