Talk:Borg-Species 8472 War
From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference.
Contents |
[edit] Page Move
Was it really neccesarry to change the entire name of the article just to add the "Species"? (unless, of course, you had already created the page before you knew that the other one existed) -- User:2 of 4
- I thought the formal title should use the full name (or designation) of the races in question ("Species 8472"), rather than a contraction ("8472") that was only used casually a few times on VOY. -- EtaPiscium 08:59, 13 Sep 2004 (CEST)
[edit] Votes for featured status
Borg-Species 8472 War. Self-nomination. -- EtaPiscium 08:18, 2 Oct 2004 (CEST)
- Support. --BlueMars 13:50, Oct 2, 2004 (CEST)
- Archived --Alan del Beccio 00:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Casualties
In the topic, it's mentioned that in the battle of Spatial Matrix 010, Grid 19 alone, the Borg lost eight planets, 312 ships, and 4,000,621 drones. In the episode wasn't the drone casualties quoted (though i can't remember what exactly) in the billions? – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 139.222.177.104 (talk). 19:00, Nov 17, 2005
- Yeah. I thought I heard that too. And anyway, conventional weapons weren't useless against them. Tuvok said that the bioship was damaged by a Borg disruptor blast.--The All-knowing Sith'ari 20:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Changed to "nearly impervious", as per your point. As for the numbers, they are accurate. From the episode: "Species 8472 has penetrated Matrix Zero-One-Zero, Grid Nineteen. Eight planets destroyed, three hundred twelve vessels disabled, four million, six hundred twenty-one Borg eliminated." -- Kingfisher 20:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PNA-unformatted
Ep references at bottom of page should really be integrated into the article, so as to no keep the reader guessing where the info is coming from. --Alan del Beccio 00:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wait, why was it removed? Alan's concern hasn't been met.– Cleanse talk 12:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- I've put it back. --OuroborosCobra talk 14:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] From FA Removal Candidates
I would like to suggest the removal of the article Borg-Species 8472 War from FA status because of the formatting error. How can this article be an FA when there is a sign at the bottom that says it needs attention? TrekFan 01:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support unless changes are made to it to satisfy the pna. It seems to be more incomplete than unformatted, though.--31dot 01:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Agree with 31dot about the PNA. Plus, with the self-nomination and single supporting vote back from 2004, how can we call this a featured article? — Topher 04:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
FA status removed.– Cleanse 01:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)