Talk:Randy Oglesby

From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference

[edit] Seven or more characters?

These guys make at best six and a half.Five and a half, after the one gets killed. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 99.129.196.116 (talk).

They are two separate characters with separate names. Just because one didn't get much screen time doesn't change that. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 03:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

No, what I mean is that they are one lifeform. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 99.129.196.116 (talk).

They aren't one life form. They are two life forms with apparently a very close symbiotic relationship. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 03:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I think what's being observed here is that he's one actor playing two characters, where the actor is digitally added alongside himself to create this effect. --Alan del Beccio 04:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

how? is there a holo-emitter at Quark's doorway or something? Haha, jut kidding, no, actually, I want to express disbelief that the actor does not really have 2 heads and 8 limbs. I'm pretty sure it's pure live action. Yours, in tlik-liQ'Tot, 76.200.151.105 08:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

TV is pretty good at having two of the same actor on screen at the same time. Look at scenes with Lore and Data together. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 08:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

That's different. Data and Lore are 2 separate/different beings/characters. Anyway I'm not talking about the technology of producing television special effects, but about whether this is one character, one-and-a-half characters, or two complete characters. And whether once Ro-Kel died we have left half a character or one whole character. My attitude is: No.99.163.50.93 05:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)